Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
Eakes
Global user
Registered: 09-2004
Location: Woodies
Posts: 9259
Karma: -3 (+46/-49)

|
|
|
|
Re: The Premiership thread
The proof is in the pudding Dan. You didn't beat Fulham and West Ham so it was unrealistic. Good grief. Liverpool aren't yet good enough to predict 4 wins out of 5. Yes they did that earlier in the season but that just reinforces their inconsistency.
Noticeable that when teams set themselves up defensively, you can't break them down.
--- Championes, championes, 00-we-oo-we-ow-we
|
|
2/Dec/2008, 11:16 am
|
Send Email to Eakes
Send PM to Eakes
|
Gooner442
Registered user
Global user
Registered: 11-2005
Location: Woodies
Posts: 1049
Karma: 0 (+6/-6)

|
|
|
|
Re: The Premiership thread
quote: iwenttoistanbul wrote:
I still stand by my view that they weren't 'entirely unrealistic'.
Dan, forget about what's realistic!.. try being an Arsenal fan, lose to Hull and Stoke, yet we beat Man U and Chelski!
|
|
2/Dec/2008, 12:11 pm
|
Send Email to Gooner442
Send PM to Gooner442
|
iwenttoistanbul
Registered user
Global user
Registered: 10-2005
Location: I'm not sure...
Posts: 10555
Karma: -9 (+82/-91)

|
|
|
|
Re: The Premiership thread
quote: Eakes wrote:
The proof is in the pudding Dan. You didn't beat Fulham and West Ham so it was unrealistic. Good grief. Liverpool aren't yet good enough to predict 4 wins out of 5. Yes they did that earlier in the season but that just reinforces their inconsistency.
Noticeable that when teams set themselves up defensively, you can't break them down.
Predicting to beat Fulham, West Ham, Hull and Blackburn is not unrealistic and I'd predict that every season.
--- 
|
|
2/Dec/2008, 2:09 pm
|
Send Email to iwenttoistanbul
Send PM to iwenttoistanbul
|
TBC Ben
Global user
Registered: 07-2005
Posts: 1419
Karma: 8 (+12/-4)
|
|
|
|
Re: The Premiership thread
quote: iwenttoistanbul wrote:
quote: Eakes wrote:
The proof is in the pudding Dan. You didn't beat Fulham and West Ham so it was unrealistic. Good grief. Liverpool aren't yet good enough to predict 4 wins out of 5. Yes they did that earlier in the season but that just reinforces their inconsistency.
Noticeable that when teams set themselves up defensively, you can't break them down.
Predicting to beat Fulham, West Ham, Hull and Blackburn is not unrealistic and I'd predict that every season.
And that, I think, is the point Eakes is getting at.
If the question was who would finish heigher in the Premiership then it would be realistic to assume Liverpool would win over all of those clubs. But, historically, they have always dropped points in individual games against mid/lower-table sides and I see no reason why this year should be any different - especially with half the team missing for some games.
|
|
2/Dec/2008, 3:14 pm
|
Send Email to TBC Ben
Send PM to TBC Ben
|
Eakes
Global user
Registered: 09-2004
Location: Woodies
Posts: 9259
Karma: -3 (+46/-49)

|
|
|
|
Re: The Premiership thread
Thank you Ben. I was beginning to think I was speaking double dutch.
--- Championes, championes, 00-we-oo-we-ow-we
|
|
2/Dec/2008, 3:40 pm
|
Send Email to Eakes
Send PM to Eakes
|
Eakes
Global user
Registered: 09-2004
Location: Woodies
Posts: 9259
Karma: -3 (+46/-49)

|
|
|
|
Re: The Premiership thread
I wouldn't trust anything he had to say. Have you read bits of his biography?? He's an idiot.
--- Championes, championes, 00-we-oo-we-ow-we
|
|
2/Dec/2008, 5:16 pm
|
Send Email to Eakes
Send PM to Eakes
|
Eakes
Global user
Registered: 09-2004
Location: Woodies
Posts: 9259
Karma: -3 (+46/-49)

|
|
|
|
Re: The Premiership thread
This is funny. How the ref didn't give a free kick to him I don't know.
Stevie
And yes Nath, it probably should have gone in the "Funny videos" thread. I may well put it in there as well.
--- Championes, championes, 00-we-oo-we-ow-we
|
|
3/Dec/2008, 9:41 am
|
Send Email to Eakes
Send PM to Eakes
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
Link to us
- Blogs
- Hall of Honour
- Chat
|
You are not logged in (login)
Board's time is: 27/Nov/2009, 5:00 pm
|
|
|