Bristol Churches FA :: BCFA Season 2008/09 :: F1 thread ~ Runboard
Bristol Churches FA
 BCFA Season 2008/09
  F1 thread  (Closed)
Support
Search
RSS

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13 

 
Kirbdawg
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 05-2006
Location: 'Slip
Posts: 2743
Karma: -6 (+27/-33)
Avatar
Re: F1 thread


quote:

Eakes wrote:

quote:

Kirbdawg wrote:

Tomorrow will be a great race. Englishmen 1-2, and 3rd if Webber can do well enough. emoticon



Is Webber not Australian Kirby??



Yes, but his blood line comes from English criminals.

---
FPL: Kirbdawg 2 - 0 Flynnjoke

"I knew Kirby had me beat"
Dan Flynn
29/Apr/2009, 2:39 pm
17/Apr/2009, 11:24 am Send Email to Kirbdawg   Send PM to Kirbdawg
 
iwenttoistanbul
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 10-2005
Location: I'm not sure...
Posts: 10555
Karma: -9 (+82/-91)
Avatar
Re: F1 thread


quote:

Kirbdawg wrote:

Tomorrow will be a great race. Englishmen 1-2, and 3rd if Webber can do well enough. emoticon



There isn't a race tomorrow. Glad to see Lewis do well but he slipped in 2nd practice.

---
Image
17/Apr/2009, 11:22 pm Send Email to iwenttoistanbul   Send PM to iwenttoistanbul
 
iwenttoistanbul
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 10-2005
Location: I'm not sure...
Posts: 10555
Karma: -9 (+82/-91)
Avatar
Re: F1 thread


1. Dan Flynn
2. John Kirby

Nuff said.

---
Image
20/Apr/2009, 1:12 pm Send Email to iwenttoistanbul   Send PM to iwenttoistanbul
 
iwenttoistanbul
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 10-2005
Location: I'm not sure...
Posts: 10555
Karma: -9 (+82/-91)
Avatar
Re: F1 thread


The F1 stewards are a joke. Not seen the Sutil/Webber incident but from what I've read, I can't believe they've only demoted Sutil 3 places! He completely screwed Webber and should start from the pits. They give 5 place penalties for smaller offences!

---
Image
26/Apr/2009, 9:53 am Send Email to iwenttoistanbul   Send PM to iwenttoistanbul
 
iwenttoistanbul
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 10-2005
Location: I'm not sure...
Posts: 10555
Karma: -9 (+82/-91)
Avatar
Re: F1 thread


1. Daniel Flynn MUST BEAT KIRBJOKE 182
2. John Kirby HAMILTON GP 151
3. Andrew Coombes ANDY'S ALLSTARS 149
4. Ben Smith MY RUBBISH TEAM 141
5. Richard Rycroft CROFTYGP 137
6. Alan Shears AND IN LAST PLACE 65

If I'd put Bourdais in instead of Buemi, I'd be joint 5th overall! emoticon

---
Image
27/Apr/2009, 9:18 am Send Email to iwenttoistanbul   Send PM to iwenttoistanbul
 
Crofty7
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 09-2007
Location: Hillfields
Posts: 1828
Karma: -3 (+8/-11)
Re: F1 thread


quote:

iwenttoistanbul wrote:

1. Daniel Flynn MUST BEAT KIRBJOKE 182
2. John Kirby HAMILTON GP 151
3. Andrew Coombes ANDY'S ALLSTARS 149
4. Ben Smith MY RUBBISH TEAM 141
5. Richard Rycroft CROFTYGP 137
6. Alan Shears AND IN LAST PLACE 65

If I'd put Bourdais in instead of Buemi, I'd be joint 5th overall! emoticon



I chose all the wrong drivers, I topped Button to win but but then had Webber instead of Vettell and Glock instead of Trulli, is I went the other way I would have had the top three. Got everything else wrong but have aneaked into a mor respectable position.

---
Shield Champions 2008/09
3rd place in division 2 - not too shabby a season in the end!!
27/Apr/2009, 9:35 am Send Email to Crofty7   Send PM to Crofty7
 
iwenttoistanbul
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 10-2005
Location: I'm not sure...
Posts: 10555
Karma: -9 (+82/-91)
Avatar
Re: F1 thread


quote:

Crofty7 wrote:

quote:

iwenttoistanbul wrote:

1. Daniel Flynn MUST BEAT KIRBJOKE 182
2. John Kirby HAMILTON GP 151
3. Andrew Coombes ANDY'S ALLSTARS 149
4. Ben Smith MY RUBBISH TEAM 141
5. Richard Rycroft CROFTYGP 137
6. Alan Shears AND IN LAST PLACE 65

If I'd put Bourdais in instead of Buemi, I'd be joint 5th overall! emoticon



I chose all the wrong drivers, I topped Button to win but but then had Webber instead of Vettell and Glock instead of Trulli, is I went the other way I would have had the top three. Got everything else wrong but have aneaked into a mor respectable position.



This is where people are going wrong! Webber was the right driver to have, he scored more points than Vettel. Every position a driver gains you get 2 points. He gained 7 places = 14 points. Vettel got about 8 points.

That's why I had Webber. I chose Buemi as he started 16th but I thought he'd gain a few places and I didn't think Hamilton would get into top 3. Hamilton got 7 points. But if I'd picked Bourdais instead of Buemi, I would have got 15 points for Bourdais because of all the places he gained.

---
Image
27/Apr/2009, 9:44 am Send Email to iwenttoistanbul   Send PM to iwenttoistanbul
 
iwenttoistanbul
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 10-2005
Location: I'm not sure...
Posts: 10555
Karma: -9 (+82/-91)
Avatar
Re: F1 thread



This is where people are going wrong! Webber was the right driver to have, he scored more points than Vettel. Every position a driver gains you get 2 points. He gained 7 places = 14 points. Vettel got about 8 points.

That's why I had Webber. I chose Buemi as he started 16th but I thought he'd gain a few places and I didn't think Hamilton would get into top 3. Hamilton got 7 points. But if I'd picked Bourdais instead of Buemi, I would have got 15 points for Bourdais because of all the places he gained.


---
Image
27/Apr/2009, 9:53 am Send Email to iwenttoistanbul   Send PM to iwenttoistanbul
 
Crofty7
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 09-2007
Location: Hillfields
Posts: 1828
Karma: -3 (+8/-11)
Re: F1 thread


quote:

iwenttoistanbul wrote:


This is where people are going wrong! Webber was the right driver to have, he scored more points than Vettel. Every position a driver gains you get 2 points. He gained 7 places = 14 points. Vettel got about 8 points.

That's why I had Webber. I chose Buemi as he started 16th but I thought he'd gain a few places and I didn't think Hamilton would get into top 3. Hamilton got 7 points. But if I'd picked Bourdais instead of Buemi, I would have got 15 points for Bourdais because of all the places he gained.



Oh so you get points for what you predict, winner, pole fastest lap etc? but the main points is on position gain during race? OH oops think that needs a emoticon

---
Shield Champions 2008/09
3rd place in division 2 - not too shabby a season in the end!!
27/Apr/2009, 10:08 am Send Email to Crofty7   Send PM to Crofty7
 
iwenttoistanbul
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 10-2005
Location: I'm not sure...
Posts: 10555
Karma: -9 (+82/-91)
Avatar
Re: F1 thread


quote:

Crofty7 wrote:

quote:

iwenttoistanbul wrote:


This is where people are going wrong! Webber was the right driver to have, he scored more points than Vettel. Every position a driver gains you get 2 points. He gained 7 places = 14 points. Vettel got about 8 points.

That's why I had Webber. I chose Buemi as he started 16th but I thought he'd gain a few places and I didn't think Hamilton would get into top 3. Hamilton got 7 points. But if I'd picked Bourdais instead of Buemi, I would have got 15 points for Bourdais because of all the places he gained.



Oh so you get points for what you predict, winner, pole fastest lap etc? but the main points is on position gain during race? OH oops think that needs a emoticon



You get points for predicting fastest practice, pole position and places 1,2,3 in race. But you also get points if you pick a driver who finishes on the podium. eg if I picked Trulli to win yesterday but he still came on the podium I got 3 points.

You get points for where your driver finishes in top 8, 1st - 10 points, 2nd 8, 3rd 6, 4th 5 and so on. You also get points for positions gained, +2 for each position, so it isn't always about picking drivers to finish in the top 8, sometimes it's best to pick drivers that are certain to gain places, like Webber yesterday and Glock in China.



---
Image
27/Apr/2009, 11:39 am Send Email to iwenttoistanbul   Send PM to iwenttoistanbul
 
Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13 






Link to us   -  Blogs   -  Hall of Honour   -  Chat
You are not logged in (login)      Board's time is: 27/Nov/2009, 9:56 am