Page: 1 2
knightflyer
Gadgeteer
Global user
Registered: 10-2004
Location: Orion Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 244
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Why?
Why do images of stars taken by telescopes have a four bright spikes emanating from them?
|
-+-
|
That's very poor but hopefully it gives you the idea.
Knightflyer
--- Stuart
---------
"What goes around come around."
"And sometimes you get what's coming around."
"And sometime you are what's coming around."
Jim Butcher, Grave Peril
|
|
12/7/2007, 21:31
|
Send Email to knightflyer
Send PM to knightflyer
|
Ray Oceanweaver
Superhero
Global user
Registered: 04-2003
Location: England, UK
Posts: 175
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Why?
Because all telescopes are secretly made by Disney.
--- Rachel
~The optimist fails as badly as the pessimist, just has a better time of it~
Wings of Rapture - For Writers of Erotica and Romance
|
|
13/7/2007, 10:19
|
Send Email to Ray Oceanweaver
Send PM to Ray Oceanweaver
Blog
|
knightflyer
Gadgeteer
Global user
Registered: 10-2004
Location: Orion Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 244
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Why?
Why didn't I think of that! But no they don't make telecopes in fluffy pink, not serious ones anyway...
--- Stuart
---------
"What goes around come around."
"And sometimes you get what's coming around."
"And sometime you are what's coming around."
Jim Butcher, Grave Peril
|
|
13/7/2007, 21:48
|
Send Email to knightflyer
Send PM to knightflyer
|
David Meadows
Editor-in-chief
Global user
Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 442
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Why?
I admit it's got me stumped. It's obviously not an atmospheric effect because Hubble does it too.
I can't remember seeing the effect directly through a telescope (but that's been a long time ago) so I think the effect lies in the camera not the telescope.
But I can't think of any mechanism that would cause it.
--- "Don't Kill the whale
Don't kill the trees
Don't kill the butterflies
Don't kill the bees"
-- Jon Anderson
|
|
14/7/2007, 8:12
|
Send Email to David Meadows
Send PM to David Meadows
|
Ray Oceanweaver
Superhero
Global user
Registered: 04-2003
Location: England, UK
Posts: 175
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Why?
I'm guessing it's the same reason why when you look at lightbulbs, you get the same sort of effect. Probably to do with some light distortion or something through the lens of the eye (or camera, in that case).
--- Rachel
~The optimist fails as badly as the pessimist, just has a better time of it~
Wings of Rapture - For Writers of Erotica and Romance
|
|
14/7/2007, 16:47
|
Send Email to Ray Oceanweaver
Send PM to Ray Oceanweaver
Blog
|
knightflyer
Gadgeteer
Global user
Registered: 10-2004
Location: Orion Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 244
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Why?
Almost but not quite. Ray's good at this (remembering Olympus Mons).
Here's a better example.

Last edited by knightflyer, 14/7/2007, 20:58
--- Stuart
---------
"What goes around come around."
"And sometimes you get what's coming around."
"And sometime you are what's coming around."
Jim Butcher, Grave Peril
|
|
14/7/2007, 20:56
|
Send Email to knightflyer
Send PM to knightflyer
|
Blitzen
Superhero
Global user
Registered: 12-2004
Location: falkirk
Posts: 148
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Why?
Its actually to do with the glass they use. You get the same effect with cameras.
--- Quick! Competition! Vote for your favourite comic scripts
http://forums.millarworld.tv/index.php?showtopic=90564&st=20
It's not clicky, though, sorry
|
|
15/7/2007, 10:19
|
Send Email to Blitzen
Send PM to Blitzen
|
knightflyer
Gadgeteer
Global user
Registered: 10-2004
Location: Orion Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 244
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Why?
Lense flares in cameras are a series circular reflections off the lenses, I don't think you get 'starbursts' with a filter.
This has to do with reflecting telescopes. So no lenses.
Knightflyer
--- Stuart
---------
"What goes around come around."
"And sometimes you get what's coming around."
"And sometime you are what's coming around."
Jim Butcher, Grave Peril
|
|
16/7/2007, 17:46
|
Send Email to knightflyer
Send PM to knightflyer
|
knightflyer
Gadgeteer
Global user
Registered: 10-2004
Location: Orion Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 244
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Why?
Ok, I guess you've given up.
It's the effect of the secondary mirror supports. There's four of them at right angles to each other.
Cue argument about seeing starbursts in camera pictures and through your own eyes.
Knightflyer
--- Stuart
---------
"What goes around come around."
"And sometimes you get what's coming around."
"And sometime you are what's coming around."
Jim Butcher, Grave Peril
|
|
17/7/2007, 20:04
|
Send Email to knightflyer
Send PM to knightflyer
|
David Meadows
Editor-in-chief
Global user
Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 442
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Why?
Would you believe I was just about to post that answer?
The secondary mirror supports was Wolfy's guess, though I wasn't convinced it was right because I don't see how the effect could be so pronounced.
I'm guessing that the supports are effectively turning the aperture into four separate quarter-apertures, and the "spokes" are where the four slightly out-of-alignment images superimpose and reinforce each other. Is that right? I can't see any other way for a blockage to increase brightness (logically you would expect it to decrease).
--- "This is most television programming. They assume that most people are subnormal. They give them subnormal television programmes and pretty soon that's the normal audience."
-- Alan Moore
|
|
17/7/2007, 20:16
|
Send Email to David Meadows
Send PM to David Meadows
|
Add a reply
Page: 1 2
Link to us
- Blogs
- Hall of Honour
- Chat
|
You are not logged in (login)
Board's time is: 28/11/2009, 5:21
|
|
|