quote:

---

warmntight wrote:

Toby Maller is a new writer, fresh on the spoof scene & is causing a big rukus with the Queen Mudder in the Forum.

Early on I thought it might be you.

Now gnarley Eric thinks it's you also.

check some of it out...
________________________________

Me & Squirell:
************************************
Toby maller: It isn't though, is it?
************************************
m&S:
LOL!!!!!

Don't you see the photo to your left?!

M&S

P.S. Love, peace and Christ be with you.


(sniff, sniff, sniff, I smell a President Bush...)


____________________________________

Well Toby - you do appear very confused. Reading back over some of your posts I'm coming to the conclusion that you are actually President Bush who disappeared from this site a while back.

Our dear, brave 'War President' loves to connect the non-connectable, such as 9/11 and Iraq. He has never once agreed to a reality check either, not to mention such a thing as reality even exists. Reality for him is what he says it is, just the same as you, apparently. So, if you're not him, this is getting 'way too spooky for me.

Looks like my medical advice should apply to you too. Only, maybe you should add a little cod liver oil in your case.

Gnarly
______________________________
Toby Maller:
Shall we go over it one more time?

Satire or parody: Are you really, really still going on about this? Honestly, please show that you understand what I've been saying all along. One last time...

I DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THE GENRE / MORALITY. Forget this hang-up you have. Please, it's embarassing. It's like you're contantly trying to bend my whole point into another argument.

How many times do I have to say it? I THOUGHT YOUR STORY SUCKED. That is my point. Yes, it's satire/parody, but in my opinion it was badly done. You missed what I and others thought was a better angle, or if you did go for the same angle YOU f**kED IT UP. I can't tell.

Please, stop rattling on about the morality issue. Let it go. Cease and desist ( I think that, as a lawyer, you'll understand that last term ).

Mr Wallin went to town on the morality issue. From my first post I said that the genre of 'tragic crime' (for want of a better title) was fair game, as far as I was concerned.

Please tell me you understand?

Much later I got a little carried away and said a few things later about how your personal opinion seemed to permeate the story, but that wasn't my central issue was it? I side-tracked a little as a result of all the side-tracking that was going on around me. You dragged folks into an ideological argument with your persistance, so I'll now wash my hands and return to my original post...

'That aside, I personally think there's more humour to be found elsewhere and that it's scraping the barrel or a bit desperate to resort to a subject as easy as this. The piece doesn't even fall into the realms of spoof or parody, because it just lays into the couple with an uninformed argument. Such an approach could work on another topic, but not this one. I didn't laugh. The 'controversial' or 'edgey' decision to write the story backfired here, because it's not particularly funny. It's more of a pompous, self-righteous rant.'

As for your next story, well you've won my personal scrutiny from hereon. I expect yours too.

I look forward to it.

PS - Sorry Erik. Can't be arsed with your inept ramblings any longer, I'm afraid. The Bush thing was nonesense to me. I'm sorry to disappoint you, but I fear I'm not who you think I am
___________________________________________

(...but I fear I'm not who you think I am) a.k.a Produce?

Me & Squirell think its sooo funny!

M&S

---

quote:

---

Jalapenoman wrote:

Sorry, but I notice you say quite definitely that you are not Helium, but kind of slip aside on the Toby thing (using the word "arse" as your excues).

I also thought that it might be you stirring the pot and ruffling the feathers.

---