Independent Satire Writers Board :: Satire of Note :: No Women please: we're satirists! ~ Runboard
Community logo

New - We'll get your stories into search engines

Independent Satire Writers Board
 Satire of Note
  No Women please: we're satirists!
Support
Search
RSS

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)


Page:  1  2  3  4 

 
briannabanks
Veteran ( or Chatterbox )
Global user

Registered: 08-2004
Location: Beaumont, Tx
Posts: 520
Karma: -1 (+63/-64)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
No Women please: we're satirists!


Just read this great article over at Pants by Ms G. Dangmit,that woman can write. The biatch makes me wanna weep into by beer. IMV, She makes some really good points about what me and Jen call the 'online satire biz' and why so few women bother to write satire at all. I hope some of y'all enjoy it.

Image

No Women please: we're satirists!

I was recently sent a comment made by a webmaster of a satirical website which made me realise why so few women writers bother to submit anything to these bastions of male chauvinist supremacy. He was commenting on the temerity of a woman to not only write satire, but to actively advertise her gender prominently on her website. Needless to add, the site in question is not utterpants! Here's what he had to say:

"The first thing that struck me was that the webmaster was a webmistress. At that point I threw out my book on the laws of internet physics. I had always assumed that running a high content humour website was on the same level as writing your name in the snow with your urine, watching Robot Wars or spending hours at a time imagining what it would be like to have breasts."

Frankly, I'm surprised he needs to 'wonder.' In my experience, most American webmasters have bigger tits than I do. If he spent more time learning how to write and less speculating on what it feels like to have a knobhead yank on one's nipples in the mistaken idea that it was remotely erotic, he might understand why most women find his brand of 'humour' only slightly less entertaining than the risible contents of his underpants.

Read Miranda's whole article here:
No Women please: we're satirists!

---
Bree
without nipples breasts would be pointless
3/20/2005, 3:09 pm Send Email to briannabanks   Send PM to briannabanks
 
russus
Veteran ( or Chatterbox )
Global user

Registered: 08-2004
Posts: 246
Karma: 20 (+33/-13)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: No Women please: we're satirists!


I'd like to agree with the sentiment. I just don't see the evidence.
3/21/2005, 1:26 am Send Email to russus   Send PM to russus
 
thereal god
Veteran ( or Chatterbox )
Global user

Registered: 08-2004
Location: the back of your neck
Posts: 285
Karma: 0 (+16/-16)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: No Women please: we're satirists!


quote:

russus wrote:

I'd like to agree with the sentiment. I just don't see the evidence.



well you asked for it:
Image

---
what's usually missing here is a sense of youmah
3/21/2005, 6:53 am Send Email to thereal god   Send PM to thereal god
 
briannabanks
Veteran ( or Chatterbox )
Global user

Registered: 08-2004
Location: Beaumont, Tx
Posts: 520
Karma: -1 (+63/-64)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: No Women please: we're satirists!


quote:

russus wrote:
I'd like to agree with the sentiment. I just don't see the evidence.


No? How many 'satire' websites do you know where even a fraction of the top writers are women. We'll pass on the Spoof coz we both know that with the exception of Mz Moore, none of the women on there can right for Sh1t.



---
Bree
without nipples breasts would be pointless
3/21/2005, 11:24 am Send Email to briannabanks   Send PM to briannabanks
 
JJ Jogolo
Veteran ( or Chatterbox )
Global user

Registered: 09-2004
Location: 20 miles straight up
Posts: 442
Karma: 46 (+49/-3)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: No Women please: we're satirists!


quote:

briannabanks wrote:

quote:

russus wrote:
I'd like to agree with the sentiment. I just don't see the evidence.


No? How many 'satire' websites do you know where even a fraction of the top writers are women. We'll pass on the Spoof coz we both know that with the exception of Mz Moore, none of the women on there can right for Sh1t.


Mz. Moore, and all alleged female writers for The Spoof should not count as female writers when it can not be determined for a fact that they are indeed female.

As for this little alien dude... if those women writers at The Spoof want me to believe their gender is as stated then they only need to come by my home and strip from the waist down - if nothing is hanging low (or high for the less fortunate men) then I will believe they are female. Anything short of that from The Spoof is lacking credibility afaiac -
I'd ban the lot of em if I could! - just on the general princible of it!

 
 
Image
Women satire writers lounge at the ISWG pool.


---
JJ
Image
Crop Circles R-US
Image

3/21/2005, 4:56 pm Send Email to JJ Jogolo   Send PM to JJ Jogolo AIM MSN Blog
 
Abdul benCamel
Veteran ( or Chatterbox )
Global user

Registered: 08-2004
Location: Bargaintown! USA
Posts: 226
Karma: 6 (+10/-4)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: No Women please: we're satirists!


Since you brought it up, I have heard that the writing of women bares them to the mirror of their souls.

Image

Last edited by Abdul benCamel, 3/22/2005, 6:34 am


---
"I'm Abdul "Ben" Camel, and I approved this Message!"
3/21/2005, 5:16 pm Send Email to Abdul benCamel   Send PM to Abdul benCamel
 
Abdul benCamel
Veteran ( or Chatterbox )
Global user

Registered: 08-2004
Location: Bargaintown! USA
Posts: 226
Karma: 6 (+10/-4)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: No Women please: we're satirists!


Not meaning to Hijack this thread completely, but the plotfullness continues to present itself;

Image

If MJ chose to be a studious B&W lady satire writer, (all puns intended), which one does he already appear to have 'morpho-dized' himself as?

Last edited by Abdul benCamel, 3/22/2005, 6:28 am


---
"I'm Abdul "Ben" Camel, and I approved this Message!"
3/22/2005, 6:22 am Send Email to Abdul benCamel   Send PM to Abdul benCamel
 
produce
Veteran ( or Chatterbox )
Global user

Registered: 08-2004
Posts: 1008
Karma: 152 (+158/-6)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: No Women please: we're satirists!


The leaf does not provide sufficient Google friendly coverage of the exposed female area.
Please do NOT make this error in judgement again! Thank you.

Helium
Editor

Image

Last edited by produce, 3/22/2005, 8:21 am
3/22/2005, 8:19 am Send Email to produce   Send PM to produce Blog
 
thereal god
Veteran ( or Chatterbox )
Global user

Registered: 08-2004
Location: the back of your neck
Posts: 285
Karma: 0 (+16/-16)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: No Women please: we're satirists!


To keep this ball rolling, I'd add that>

Image

Helium overlooked the fact that by moving the picture to cover that which was previously more tastefully obscured, he uncovered the hardbound edition of Ms. G's, Notes on Nude Punctuation, which should in fact be hidden from the roving eye of Sir Google, hence the newly placed 'frame of subtle censorship'

Last edited by thereal god, 3/23/2005, 7:46 am


---
what's usually missing here is a sense of youmah
3/22/2005, 11:31 am Send Email to thereal god   Send PM to thereal god
 
produce
Veteran ( or Chatterbox )
Global user

Registered: 08-2004
Posts: 1008
Karma: 152 (+158/-6)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: No Women please: we're satirists!


only thereal god could come up with a concept that even GOOGLE knows nothing of ..

"Nude Punctuation"



Image


Hold on. Let me go try "different keywords" as Google suggests.
 

Last edited by produce, 3/22/2005, 1:03 pm
3/22/2005, 1:02 pm Send Email to produce   Send PM to produce Blog
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3  4 






Link to us   -  Blogs   -  Hall of Honour   -  Chat
You are not logged in (login)      Board's time is: 11/27/2009, 6:09 pm